local · vote intention
Ipsos
Prompted local/state election preference; all respondents
Reported margin of error: ±4.37 percentage points.
Population: Lima provincial municipal ballot. Fieldwork 2026-08-05–2026-08-06 · published 2026-08-10. Sample 502.
Attached only to LIMA / LIMA — Provincial municipal ballot.
Responses for poll-561fdfd4ef0f3bbaa6088e8f| Response | Value |
|---|
| Rafael López Aliaga (Renovación Popular) | 21% |
| Carlos Bruce (Somos Perú) | 13% |
Poll snapshot; no calibrated win probability or automatic incumbent-defeat flag
Rafael López Aliaga (Renovación Popular) 21%, Carlos Bruce (Somos Perú) 13%. Numerical gap 8 percentage points. The two reported percentage ranges overlap; no clear separation is inferred from this simple check. Undecided 21%. Technical sheet on page 12; candidate chart on pages 4–5. Website article is dated 10 August; search metadata showed 28 August and is not used.
local · vote intention
CPI
Prompted local/state election preference; all respondents
Reported margin of error: ±5.7 percentage points.
Population: Miraflores district municipal ballot. Fieldwork 2026-08-17–2026-08-21 · published 2026-08-26. Sample 300.
Attached only to LIMA / LIMA / MIRAFLORES — District municipal ballot.
Responses for poll-953add6a0b79623b165fe666| Response | Value |
|---|
| Alessio Cantella | 20% |
| Jorge Muñoz | 16.6% |
Poll snapshot; no calibrated win probability or automatic incumbent-defeat flag
Alessio Cantella 20%, Jorge Muñoz 16.6%. Numerical gap 3.4 percentage points. The two reported percentage ranges overlap; no clear separation is inferred from this simple check. Undecided 23.3%.
local · vote intention
CPI
Prompted local/state election preference; all respondents
Reported margin of error: ±5.2 percentage points.
Population: La Molina district municipal ballot. Fieldwork 2026-08-17–2026-08-21 · published 2026-08-26. Sample 350.
Attached only to LIMA / LIMA / LA MOLINA — District municipal ballot.
Responses for poll-fe0ef63f781ee4af6e9ff0a0| Response | Value |
|---|
| Juan Carlos Zurek | 21.7% |
| Sergio Castromonte | 16.6% |
Poll snapshot; no calibrated win probability or automatic incumbent-defeat flag
Juan Carlos Zurek 21.7%, Sergio Castromonte 16.6%. Numerical gap 5.1 percentage points. The two reported percentage ranges overlap; no clear separation is inferred from this simple check. Undecided 31.1%.
local · vote intention
CPI
Prompted local/state election preference; all respondents
Reported margin of error: ±4.9 percentage points.
Population: Los Olivos district municipal ballot. Fieldwork 2026-07-31–2026-08-04 · published 2026-08-26. Sample 400.
Attached only to LIMA / LIMA / LOS OLIVOS — District municipal ballot.
Responses for poll-8bd052040bb05851bb8e53fa| Response | Value |
|---|
| Felipe Castillo Alfaro | 26.1% |
| Erick Melchor | 10.6% |
Poll snapshot; no calibrated win probability or automatic incumbent-defeat flag
Felipe Castillo Alfaro 26.1%, Erick Melchor 10.6%. Numerical gap 15.5 percentage points. The reported point estimates show a lead at fieldwork time. Undecided 28.4%.
local · vote intention
CPI
Prompted local/state election preference; all respondents
Reported margin of error: ±6.2 percentage points.
Population: Pueblo Libre district municipal ballot. Fieldwork 2026-08-11–2026-08-14 · published 2026-08-26. Sample 250.
Attached only to LIMA / LIMA / PUEBLO LIBRE — District municipal ballot.
Responses for poll-09c463eee7021ce17dc68be8| Response | Value |
|---|
| Jhonel Leguía | 24.8% |
| Cecilia Acosta | 13.6% |
Poll snapshot; no calibrated win probability or automatic incumbent-defeat flag
Jhonel Leguía 24.8%, Cecilia Acosta 13.6%. Numerical gap 11.2 percentage points. The two reported percentage ranges overlap; no clear separation is inferred from this simple check. Undecided 35.6%.
local · vote intention
CPI
Prompted local/state election preference; all respondents
Reported margin of error: ±5.2 percentage points.
Population: Santiago De Surco district municipal ballot. Fieldwork 2026-08-14–2026-08-19 · published 2026-08-26. Sample 350.
Attached only to LIMA / LIMA / SANTIAGO DE SURCO — District municipal ballot.
Responses for poll-0c83e9b3d14a50cda401e42a| Response | Value |
|---|
| Arturo Bobbio | 30.6% |
| Juan Palma | 22.6% |
Poll snapshot; no calibrated win probability or automatic incumbent-defeat flag
Arturo Bobbio 30.6%, Juan Palma 22.6%. Numerical gap 8 percentage points. The two reported percentage ranges overlap; no clear separation is inferred from this simple check. Undecided 19.1%.
local · vote intention
CPI
Prompted local/state election preference; all respondents
Reported margin of error: ±5.7 percentage points.
Population: San Borja district municipal ballot. Fieldwork 2026-08-15–2026-08-19 · published 2026-08-26. Sample 300.
Attached only to LIMA / LIMA / SAN BORJA — District municipal ballot.
Responses for poll-df71ac8963433cff0d4733ab| Response | Value |
|---|
| Javier Diez | 26.7% |
| Alberto Tejada | 14.7% |
Poll snapshot; no calibrated win probability or automatic incumbent-defeat flag
Javier Diez 26.7%, Alberto Tejada 14.7%. Numerical gap 12 percentage points. The reported point estimates show a lead at fieldwork time. Undecided 23.7%.
local · vote intention
CPI
Prompted local/state election preference; all respondents
Reported margin of error: ±5.7 percentage points.
Population: San Isidro district municipal ballot. Fieldwork 2026-08-14–2026-08-18 · published 2026-08-26. Sample 300.
Attached only to LIMA / LIMA / SAN ISIDRO — District municipal ballot.
Responses for poll-4fa0eab89cc16a946744b9d0| Response | Value |
|---|
| Javier Paino | 17.3% |
| Víctor Hugo Bazán | 14.7% |
Poll snapshot; no calibrated win probability or automatic incumbent-defeat flag
Javier Paino 17.3%, Víctor Hugo Bazán 14.7%. Numerical gap 2.6 percentage points. The two reported percentage ranges overlap; no clear separation is inferred from this simple check. Undecided 44.7%.
local · vote intention
CPI
Prompted local/state election preference; all respondents
Reported margin of error: ±4.9 percentage points.
Population: San Martin De Porres district municipal ballot. Fieldwork 2026-08-18–2026-08-23 · published 2026-08-26. Sample 400.
Attached only to LIMA / LIMA / SAN MARTIN DE PORRES — District municipal ballot.
Responses for poll-455dbc5a812c735a625d058f| Response | Value |
|---|
| Peter Jaime | 15.3% |
| Adolfo Mattos | 10.5% |
Poll snapshot; no calibrated win probability or automatic incumbent-defeat flag
Peter Jaime 15.3%, Adolfo Mattos 10.5%. Numerical gap 4.8 percentage points. The two reported percentage ranges overlap; no clear separation is inferred from this simple check. Undecided 34.2%.
national · presidential approval
AtlasIntel / Bloomberg
Presidential job approval
Named officeholder in this observation: José Balcázar
Reported margin of error: ±3 percentage points.
Population: National presidential approval; context for subnational races. Fieldwork 2026-07-30–2026-08-03. Sample 982.
Atlas RDR, digitally recruited and post-stratified national adult sample; reported 95% confidence margin
National context — not a local forecast and not attached to a municipal office.
Responses for poll-3c9bc4f5c8791e36eda5f86a| Response | Value |
|---|
| Approve | 23.2% |
| Disapprove | 56.2% |
| Unsure | 20.6% |
Context indicator only; no uniform national-to-local swing or win probability
Earlier comparison wave; named officeholder and question wording retained. Outgoing-president evaluation, not the new administration baseline.
national · presidential approval
AtlasIntel / Bloomberg
Presidential job approval
Named officeholder in this observation: Keiko Fujimori
Reported margin of error: ±2 percentage points.
Population: National presidential approval; context for subnational races. Fieldwork 2026-08-30–2026-09-03. Sample 1,769.
Atlas RDR, digitally recruited and post-stratified national adult sample; reported 95% confidence margin
National context — not a local forecast and not attached to a municipal office.
Responses for poll-ffea31ae4fb1caa099a342cf| Response | Value |
|---|
| Approve | 42.8% |
| Disapprove | 40.3% |
| Unsure | 16.9% |
Context indicator only; no uniform national-to-local swing or win probability
The July question evaluates outgoing José Balcázar and August evaluates Keiko Fujimori. No within-president change is computed. The new administration has a small positive approval balance and 16.9% unsure; this does not establish movement in regional or municipal voting intentions.